An Indian love-interest in an American movie?
January 18, 2010
I saw The Lovely Bones at the movie theatre downtown today, and first of all, let me say that it’s an amazing movie and I highly recommend it. However, it’s not the movie plot that I’m going to rant about, but a certain character. Reece Ritchie is cast as Ray Singh, the Indian love interest of the main character. You heard me right, he’s Indian. Oh, but you say that Reece Ritchie doesn’t sound like an Indian name? That’s because Reece Ritchie isn’t Indian. More under the cut. And for those who haven’t seen it yet, there are very mild spoilers, but nothing that would ruin the plot. I don’t know if you could technically call them spoilers, but I only talk about a minor character and his portrayal, nothing plot-related.
Usually in movies, nonwhite characters are nonwhite for a reason. Usually, this reason involves perpetuating stereotypes. For example, Indian characters are usually scientists (computer or otherwise), convenience store workers, or exchange students. In The Lovely Bones, Ray Singh was none of these things. He was not portrayed as a loner, nor as a nerd who was only interested in math and/or science (on the contrary, he was a poet who enjoyed Shakespeare).
Now, keep in mind that I haven’t read the book. Because of this, my perspective on The Lovely Bones is a little different from someone who had. I’ve spoken to friends who have read it and read articles about it by people who have read it, and many of them seem disappointed at how Ray appeared. It appears the book described him as dark-skinned, while Reece Ritchie, who plays Ray, is lightly tanned. In fact, Reece isn’t even Indian, even though he’s not white either (he’s multi-racial) and he has Indian-looking features. His parents are portrayed as overtly Indian (his mother appears in a sari) and yet, he does not. For many people, Reece’s lack of pigment was disappointing.
Sure, I would like to have seen and Indian actor playing Ray, but I’m not going to focus on it too much. What’s most important is the fact that the main love interest is Indian, despite the fact that his being Indian doesn’t contribute to his role in the film or his character. In fact, they don’t even say outright that he’s Indian (although they do mention that he’s from England). The only way one would notice that he’s Indian is from his dark skin, his last name (Singh, a common Indian last name that his teacher uses to refer to him once or twice), and the fact that his parents are Indian.
Despite the fact that some are disappointed by this, I see it as a step in the right direction. I know there are some differences between the movie and the book, and I’m not sure whether his race is more highlighted in the book. If anybody has read the book recently and wants to provide more information about Ray’s portrayal and ethnicity in the books, I would greatly appreciate it.

Reece Ritchie, who plays Ray Singh
January 18, 2010 at 9:04 am
I’ve read the book, and given the time period of the day (1950′s or 1960′s), the fact he liked Susie and she also liked him was probably taboo, since she is white and Ray is Indian. Ray’s race is only mentioned for that reason and the clash between her parents and Ray’s parents at certain parts.
January 22, 2010 at 10:07 pm
The book takes place in the 70′s, 1973 or 1974 is when she is murdered. I suppose it might have been taboo but the book never mentions it. Ray Singh is described as tan (or dark, whatever that should mean) with gray eyes. I haven’t watched the movie yet however the Reece fits the bill except his eye color (which is mentioned several times in the book). Reece is tan enough, not all indians need to be very dark. However, I did find it to be interesting that her love interest is Indian, since that rarely occurs in American movies. Hope the movie is as good as the book!
January 23, 2010 at 6:03 pm
I thought he was a horrible choice for the film. He is 25 and looks older and Saoirse Ronan (Susie Salmon) is 14 and looks younger than her age.
For a movie about a sick pedophile it was a pretty stupid choice to cast Reece Ritchie as the Saoirse Ronans love interest. The kissing scene was awkward and didn’t have the innocence and charm the film was going for. Every scene between them felt wrong and a bit dirty.
The whole movie made you hate the pedophile because of his destruction of innocence, yet we are supposed to accept the pedophilia relationship between Ritchie and Ronan as sweet and innocent?
Horrible movie, it had potential but casting choices and the abysmal ending ruined it for me.
May 3, 2010 at 4:49 am
Well, I’ve read the book and saw the movie and I don’t have any recollection of any big deal made about him being Indian. He is a really good looking guy and I thought he was perfect for the role. Why do so many of you feel he is’t “Indian-looking” enough. Isn’t that a stereotype in itself? He was obviously ethnic, but I didn’t know his ancestory and I didn’t think it pertained to the story at all. I loved the relationship he had with Susie. I thought it was very beautiful and very honest. I mean isn’t that why they call it “acting?”
May 26, 2011 at 2:46 pm
I actually thought his whole matured-look thing works since according to the book, he acts more matured than most people his age… And of course, the accent works but maybe they had a hard time looking for an Indian guy with British accent…
February 11, 2010 at 9:20 pm
I totally disagree with Alex.
Reece Ritchie was fantastic. I thought he played his part well and did portray the look of a student(Senior) i thought the interaction between the two(Susie) was just wonderful. And i was very disappointed when they did not get a chance to meet.
The guy is gorgeous!!!
March 15, 2010 at 9:26 am
I really wish people would stop putting such emphasis on race. I’m all for equality and all of that, but I think in this day and age people who bring it up in the attempt to promote their race and move themselves forward really exacerbate the situation. I think it’s these empowered movements that make the ignorant feel threatened and defensive about their race and pushes them to reinforce what little segregation and separation exists. And yes these things do exist, but they exist only in social constraints, which can be easily overcome if people stop pressing the issue. It’s refreshing when a story is told or an anecdote is shared amongst friends that merely describes a man or a woman, or a boy or a girl, and not “this indian guy” or “a white chick” and so on. And even if every race isn’t displayed in paramount context and promoted throughout American culture, the whole point of culture is you have your own. Every race has their own vibrant culture, rich with traditions, stories, and celebration, and it should be THAT that defines you, not your station and your fight for recognition.
(P.S. Sorry to rant! Didn’t see the movie. Or the book. =/)
March 15, 2010 at 9:47 am
Im typing this so i can subscribe to comments on here, y’all.
March 16, 2010 at 10:59 pm
Well said Wyatt Q. I couldn’t have said it better myself. I was thinking it the whole time I was reading everyone else’s posts. I’ve read the book and seen the film. I’m also of Indian origin but never place emphasis on it. I’m a girl, a woman, a Brit, a Human Being. The colour of my skin is irrelevant.
March 17, 2010 at 12:48 am
I’m Indian as well, which is why this particularly stood out for me. I’m glad that although he was an Indian character, his Indianness wasn’t put under a spotlight.
In contrast, Jennifer’s Body has an awkward background character known simply as “Ahmet from India” (they say it as if “from India” was his last name), a character that was completely unnecessary to the plot but only present as the other half of an odd juxtaposition. Granted, I only saw the first few minutes of the movie, but still… between the two, I prefer the portrayal in The Lovely Bones.
March 17, 2010 at 8:39 am
I appreciate the backup Nisha =)
And Anisha, that’s what you get for going to see Jennifer’s Body in the first place. Though it can be a tricky issue. I think a good step would be to ignore the difference between us entirely, but an even better step would be to all be able to laugh at those differences. In the words of Yahtzee: “A society that can laugh at its social and racial differences is a truly tolerant one.” It warms my heart and makes me smile that all over the world people are paying good money, sitting down, and eating dinner just to laugh. Maybe there’s some hope for us all after all.
March 17, 2010 at 9:18 am
Well I didn’t go to see it, I saw it online. At least I didn’t waste my money.
And I agree completely, especially about being able to laugh at the differences.
March 17, 2010 at 8:41 am
I appreciate the backup Nisha =)
And Anisha, that’s what you get for going to see Jennifer’s Body in the first place. Though it can be a tricky issue. I think a good step would be to ignore the difference between us entirely, but an even better step would be to all be able to laugh at those differences. In the words of Yahtzee: “A society that can laugh at its social and racial differences is a truly tolerant one.” It warms my heart and makes me smile that all over the world people are paying good money, sitting down, and eating dinner just to laugh. Maybe there’s some hope for us all after all.
May 19, 2010 at 11:06 pm
Have you ever been there? What was that experience like?
June 6, 2010 at 1:56 am
There are plenty of actors who portray characters of different nationalities of which they are not. For one, Madonna played an Argentinian in the movie “Evita” when she is clearly a white american woman. Argentina has a majority of people who have the “characterisitics” of a white american person. Therefore, Madonna was asked to play that particular part. I watched the movie without having read the book with a friend of mine who had read the book long before a movie was even optioned. I personaly liked Reece Ritchie as Ray and I didn’t know how old he was in the movie, but I assumed he was sixteen or fifteen.So I don’t see how the age gap would cause a problem because they both looked young in the movie. Lot’s of movies in present day do not stick with casting actors that are about the same age as the character. Obviously, Robert Pattinson, who plays the role of Edward Cullen, is not 17 and looks rather old. That did no stop the casting director from casting him in the movies. In every film adaptation of a book there will be differences. Obviously, what is written on paper can not easily be put in a movie and there is not alot of time to put every single thing in the book in the movie.Especially, with the way the book is writtn with “supernatural” way that Susie appears to her brother and father. The director does not want to lose the audience with a five hour movie. I guess you could say movies are meant to be “short and sweet.”
June 30, 2010 at 4:57 pm
So, I saw the movie and read the book, and I was disappointed. It’s not that I am against equality, it’s just that so many movies always give white actors the main character role whether the character is a different ethnicity. It’s not about races, it really isn’t. It’s more about seeing our culture getting somewhere, being respected, and having a good name. Avatar has an all white crew except for Dev patel, which i think is just wrong, since the cartoon is definitely oriental, prince of persia does not have many middle eastern actors, though it is persian based. It’s just the fact that you don’t see anything except white people trying to be different. I’m not hating on white people, but it’s really a history where there was white supremacy and other cultures were oppressed. I just wanted to see my race have some part of “american films” and not be ridiculed like Bollywood is in America.
July 30, 2010 at 4:32 pm
There actually is a stereotype at play here. In the early ’70s, there weren’t enough South Asians in the USA to support the doctor/engineer/cabdriver/cornershop stereotypes prevalent today. However, the ’60s hippie culture gave rise to a certain cool-hip factor to South Asians in the early 70s. They were considered cultured, gentle, spiritual, learned, and fascinating. A kind of Piscean Chic that would be considered way too effeminate today but was all the rage in the early 70s. This was born out on college campuses across the nation – every single South Asian grad student I knew back then was dating a Caucasian – the white ppl were attracted to them like flies.
I think Peter Jackson and Reece Ritchie portrayed this stereotype of the ’70s South Asian, as Susie Salmon must have seen it, to a T.
October 27, 2010 at 8:20 pm
For one I thought he was Indian. I did not know he was British and African American. I do have many Punjabi friends who come in ALL skin tones. Two, he did an excellent job in the role of Ray Singh. They had such chemistry I thought is was real. Actually everything about the movie felt real. It’s why I’m here to comment on this post in particular.
@Sad Indian Girl
Why are you let down when the movie where roles had already been clearly decided when the books was written? There’s so many factors people need to look at. The time era in this movie for one. And who wrote the book for two. There are many people who write books about things they know.
Writing a book with other races can be hard. I write and I’m multi racial. Sadly I do tend to make my characters Koreans, Blacks, and Hispanics because is it easier for me to relate and write about them.
I’m not getting what the problem is. I’d cast people who looked the part and had the chemistry with the other actors/actress.
March 1, 2011 at 6:46 pm
i saw the movie and it was good and nicely potrayed.but i also think racial differences do occur. if a white person potray the indian character then what is left for indians(like in gandhi).no offence . isn,t indian roles be taken by indians only
July 18, 2011 at 7:00 am
It happened the same in THE SOCIAL NETWORK. Divya Narendra was played by non indian guy..